Cloud Function Comparison AWS Lambda vs. Google Cloud Functions vs. Azure Functions

November 25, 2021

Cloud Function Comparison: AWS Lambda vs. Google Cloud Functions vs. Azure Functions

In recent years, serverless computing has become increasingly popular among developers. One of the main reasons for this is the availability of cloud function services that allow developers to run their code without worrying about server maintenance. AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, and Azure Functions are some of the most popular cloud function services available. In this guide, we will compare these three services and help you choose which one to use for your project.

Pricing

As with any cloud service, pricing is an important consideration. AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, and Azure Functions all offer pay-per-use pricing models. However, the pricing structure for each service can vary.

AWS Lambda charges based on the number of requests, duration of the request, and the amount of memory used. The first 1 million requests per month are free, after which you'll be charged $0.20 per 1 million requests, with a duration charge of $0.00001667 per GB-second.

Google Cloud Functions charges based on the number of requests, duration of the request, and the amount of memory used. The first 2 million requests per month are free, after which you'll be charged $0.40 per 1 million requests, with a duration charge of $0.0000025 per GB-second.

Azure Functions charges based on the number of executions and the amount of memory used. The first 1 million executions per month are free, after which you'll be charged $0.20 per 1 million executions, with a duration charge of $0.000016 per GB-second.

As you can see, the pricing for AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions is quite similar. Azure Functions, on the other hand, charges based on the number of executions rather than the number of requests.

Programming Languages

All three of these cloud function services support a variety of programming languages. AWS Lambda supports Node.js, Python, Go, Java, .NET, and Ruby. Google Cloud Functions supports Node.js, Python, Go, Java, .NET, and Ruby. Azure Functions supports Node.js, Python, C#, F#, Java, PowerShell, and TypeScript.

Integrations

When choosing a cloud function service, it's important to consider the integrations available. AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, and Azure Functions all integrate with a variety of other cloud services.

AWS Lambda integrates well with other AWS services, including Amazon S3, DynamoDB, and Amazon Kinesis.

Google Cloud Functions integrates well with other Google Cloud services, including Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud Pub/Sub, and Google Cloud Firestore.

Azure Functions integrates well with other Azure services, including Azure Blob Storage, Azure Event Hubs, and Azure Cosmos DB.

Performance

AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions are both known for their fast performance. Azure Functions, while still performing well, can sometimes lag behind in terms of speed. However, it's important to note that performance can vary depending on the size of your function, the amount of memory allocated to it, and other factors.

Conclusion

All three of these cloud function services are great choices and offer similar features. The key differences lie in pricing, programming language support, integrations, and performance. Depending on your specific needs, one of these services may be a better fit for your project than the others.

We hope this guide has helped you make an informed decision. Happy coding!

References


© 2023 Flare Compare